Right now?
Blogs
My good eye
Recent tunes
Old Posts
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
- July 2002
- May 1787


Ryan :
Date: April 20, 2004 @ 7:17 am
Rachel’s impersonation of Robert. I think she could have done a better job personally.
David :
Date: April 20, 2004 @ 8:47 am
Digital camera’s are EVIL!!
chris :
Date: April 20, 2004 @ 10:02 am
funny funny
Jum :
Date: April 20, 2004 @ 10:52 am
you should post our photo whispers, then we’ll see that rachel really was just inpersonating you doing that.
Rach :
Date: April 20, 2004 @ 12:48 pm
I HATE YOU!!
how come you’re allowed to impersonate me in photos and not blog them, but when I impersonate you you blow them up to extra large???
howie :
Date: April 20, 2004 @ 12:55 pm
i didnt blow it up, in fact i had to reduce it down to 30% of its original size.
do you want me to take it down ?
Rach :
Date: April 20, 2004 @ 2:28 pm
lol no its ok. it gives me an excuse to punch you in the head more frequently.